It appears bewildered as indeed famously do the men in question His ministers have misled the House, his credibility has melted away. I really must apologise to Conservatives everywhere: I've been drowning kittens all week and kicking puppies over the garden wall. We will be putting out a Federal Register notice right after these negotiations inviting public comment for our Doha agenda environmental review on the developments of this stage of work. We would like to get public comment on these negotiations - how they affect the environment of the United States and others - with the goal of trying to complete the interim environmental review by early in the course of 2004.. We hope as we move forward with that agreement to try to link it to a co-operative mechanism.Over the next couple of days [in Cancun], we will move forward the Doha negotiations as part of this environmental review process. This identifies some particular environmental/economic challenges of this trade agreement, focusing on topics such as migratory birds, since a number of the countries in Central America are not only nesting but transit sites between North and South America; wildlife conservation; and marine pollution. So the US does environmental reviews with each of our trade agreements. These are a rolling process and give us a guide to some elements that we can try to do, either in the trade agreement or ancillary to the trade agreement.To give you an example of what this means in practical terms, we've had an interim environmental review of a trade agreement with the five countries of Central America. This is a concept that the United States has invited other countries to consider as a way of strengthening the nexus between environment and trade. As part of our negotiations of free trade agreements, we set various environmental objectives and have various provisions for the enforcement of those obligations One other thing we do with our environmental advisory committees is to refine the process of environmental reviews. We have found, as in a number of areas of our trade negotiations, that some of our work with individual countries or small regions provides laboratories for us to advance the state of work in co-operative areas, and this has been particularly true in the environmental area with our free trade agreements.
It is simply a question of when.The writer's essay 'The Real Love that Dare Not Speak its Name' is published this week in 'Children and their Families; Contact, Rights & Welfare' (University of Cambridge Socio-Legal Group). And regardless of whether the professionals acknowledge this, the vast majority of my correspondents, friends and others regard it to be so If this is the commonly held view, then the law will change. The notion that the law is gender neutral is a grotesque lie to which all family law professionals have tacitly agreed to be party; this is acknowledged by nearly all the lawyers I have talked to. It appears bewildered, as indeed famously do the men in question. What is their new role? What is expected of them? How do they now define themselves in this more fluid brave new world?And if the world now flexes, bends and warps like morality itself, why is the law so rigid, so inflexible and fixed that its application to individuals binds them to an overweening and restrictive state of Orwellian proportions --the common experience of those who find themselves victims of the secret world of the Family Courts.The law must now root itself in reality, not social-work theorising, or emotive or traditional notions of men and women's roles. Count the economic and social cost - serious illness and alcolholism in men arising from divorce, unhappiness on a vast scale, housing and social problems, that are directly related to the inequalities and iniquities of family law.What more is required to make men the same in the eyes of the law as they are in the eyes of their children? The altered state of women has of course produced the altered state of men Men cannot be the same because women are not The law will not acknowledge this, and it must. Losing control of one's life is a desperate experience; having someone else exert control over it is worse. Such a review needs to be undertaken in the real world - that which contemporary couples inhabit - not the world fondly imagined by a judiciary notoriously ill-equipped to deal with how we live now.The world of the family courts is a silent one, a secret and overarching state which has enormous powers over the lives of two people who have fallen out of love and now face intrusion, intervention, imprisonment - penalties and powers that would be unconstitutional if applied to murderers, drug dealers or rapists. And yet while individuals struggle with these difficult new conundrums, the laws governing the, if you will, "intimate" parts of society, the "personal" laws, remain (though some are fairly recently drafted) unaltered in their presumptions, save for the pathetic pretence that they are gender neutral.I believe it is time for a wholesale review of what marriage means today, the validity of its contract and the consequences of its rupture. If the later 20th century saw the transformation of women's lives, then the 21st century involves the transformation of men's lives, and by definition the lives of their children.The cardinal - and excellent - difference between now and the past is that it is no longer clear, until it is determined by the couples in question, who will do the breadwinning and who the nurturing, or whether it will be both simultaneously. Rulings appear to be based on the "sugar and spice and all things nice" school of biological determinism, rather than on anything more significant. The law, to its eternal discredit, stands in the way of great and important cultural and social progression. |
 |
 |
